The debt bias in company financing decisions - problems and possible solutions

Nelly Popova

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of the present article is to compare the relative strengths and weaknesses of thin capitalisation rules and allowances for corporate equity which are the main approaches used in modern tax systems to address the debt bias and have been an integral part of proposals for international coordination of corporate income taxation.

Methodology: The theoretical methods applied in the article are review of the existing literature on the topic and comparative analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the main approaches to the debt bias.

Results: Although thin capitalisation rules and allowances for corporate equity contribute to the reduction of the problems associated with the debt bias, both types of methods have their limitations. The two approaches are analysed in the article from the perspective of international reform proposals within the BEPS project and the EU as the effective elimination of the distortions caused by the debt bias can be achieved only in coordinated manner.

Originality: The paper adds to the growing body of literature on the topic by summarising the main strengths and weaknesses of the two main methods for resolving the debt bias and analysing them from the perspective of the reforms of international tax rules.

Keywords: Corporate income taxation, Debt bias, Thin capitalisation rules, Allowances for corporate equity, International tax coordination

 

https://doi.org/10.58869/EJABM008/SI05


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bank, S. (2014). Historical Perspective on the Corporate Interest Deduction. Chapman Law Review, 18(1), 29-48.

Blouin, J., Huizinga, H., Laeven, L., & Nicodème , G. (2014). Thin Capitalization Rules and Multinational Firm Capital Structure. Washington: IMF. Retrieved April 4, 2023, from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2014/wp1412.pdf

De Mooij, R. (2011). Tax Biases to Debt Finance: Assessing the Problem, Finding Solutions. Retrieved April 12, 2023, from IMF Staff Discussion Note: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2011/sdn1111.pdf

De Mooij, R., & Liu, L. (2021). At A Cost: The Real Effects of Thin Capitalization Rules. Washington: IMF. Retrieved January 29, 2023, from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2021/02/05/At-A-Cost-The-Real-Effects-of-Thin-Capitalization-Rules-49999

Devereux, M. (2012). Issues in the Design of Taxes on Corporate Profit. National Tax Journal, 65(3). doi:10.17310/ntj.2012.3.08

Devereux, M., & De Mooij, R. (2011). An Applied Analysis of ACE and CBIT Reforms in the EU. International Tax and Public Finance, 18(1), 93-120. doi:10.1007/s10797-010-9138-8

European Commission. (2013). Tax reforms in EU: Tax policy challenges for economic growth and fi scal sustainability. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2013/ee5_en.htm

European Commission. (2021). Business Taxation for the 21st Century. COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN. Retrieved from European Commission: https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-05/communication_on_business_taxation_for_the_21st_century.pdf

European Commission. (2022). Proposal for a Council Directive on laying down rules on a debt-equity bias reduction allowance and on limiting the deductibility of interest for corporate income tax purposes. Retrieved March 29, 2023, from European Commission: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52022PC0216

European Commission. (2023). The debt-equity bias reduction allowance (DEBRA). Retrieved from European Commission. Taxation and Customs Union: https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/taxation-1/debt-equity-bias_en

European Parliament. (2022, March 27). Debt-equity Bias Reduction Allowance (DEBRA). Retrieved from EU Legislation in Progress Briefing: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/733678/EPRS_BRI(2022)733678_EN.pdf

Fatica, S., Hemmelgarn, T., & Nicodème, G. (2013). The Debt-Equity Tax Bias: Consequences and Solutions. Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, 5-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.3917/rpve.521.0005

IMF. (2021). Nonfinancial corporate debt, loans and debt securities. Retrieved April 21, 2023, from IMF: https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NFC_LS@GDD/CHN

Kayis-Kumar, A. (2015). Thin capitalisation rules: A second-best solution to the cross-border debt bias? Munich: Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/72031/1/MPRA_paper_72031.pdf

Kayis-Kumar, A., Rose, T., & Breunig, R. (2021). Design considerations for an Allowance for Corporate Equity (ACE) for Australia. Crawford School of Public Policy. Tax and Transfer Policy Institute. Canberra: Australian National University. Retrieved from https://taxpolicy.crawford.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/publication/taxstudies_crawford_anu_edu_au/2022-03/complete_ace_wp_2022.pdf

Locher, T. (2021). Thin-Cap Rules in Europe. Washnington: Tax Foundation. Retrieved January 13, 2023, from https://taxfoundation.org/thin-cap-rules-in-europe-2021/

Luca, O., & Tieman, A. (2016). Financial Sector Debt Bias. Retrieved April 1, 2023, from IMF Working Paper: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2016/wp16217.pdf

OECD. (2017). Limiting Base Erosion Involving Interest Deductions and Other Financial Payments, Action 4 - 2016 Update. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264268333-en

OECD. (2023). BEPS: Incluive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. Retrieved January 17, 2023, from Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development: https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/

Official Journal of the European Union. (2016). Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164 of 12 July 2016 laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market. Retrieved from Eur-Lex: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32016L1164

Petutschnig, M., & Rünger, S. (2022). The Effect of an Allowance for Corporate Equity on Capital Structure: Evidence From Austria. Public Finance Review, 50(5), 515-642. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421221125150

Pomerleau, K., Bunn, D., & Locher, T. (2021). Anti-Base Erosion Provisions and Territorial Tax Systems in OECD Countries. Retrieved from Tax Foundation: https://taxfoundation.org/anti-base-erosion-territorial-tax-systems#Interest




Copyright (c) 2023 European Journal of Applied Business and Management

 

European Journal of Applied Business and Management

ISSN: 2183-5594

DOI: https://doi.org/10.58869/EJABM

Indexing:

EBSCO | CROSSREF | GOOGLE SCHOLAR | LATINDEX | DRJI | ICI JOURNALS MASTER | REDIB | MIAR