Institutional distance and multinational enterprises’ FDI decisions in Portugal

Marcelo Duarte, Fernando Carvalho

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine institutional distance effects on foreign multinational enterprises’ strategic FDI decisions in Portugal. Following a disaggregated distance construct, this paper also investigates the differentiated effects of each dimension of distance.

Design/methodology/approach: To test the proposed hypothesis a panel data analysis is used with random effects and regressions are estimated through Generalized Least Squares (GLS).

Findings: The results confirm the existence of a significant relationship between institutional distance and FDI decisions into Portugal, whereas the differentiated effects of each dimension were also confirmed, with seven out of nine dimensions of institutional distance being found to significantly influence those strategic decisions. Among them, administrative distance has been found to consistently deter foreign investment decisions in Portugal, likely due to legal issues.

Originality: Previous research in international business pointed to detrimental effects of distance on FDI decisions. By examining those decisions with a disaggregated construct, this study demonstrates that different dimensions of distance can affect FDI decisions differently. As the vast majority of international business studies focus on US firms, this paper contributes with a different point of view, expanding the empirical research of Portuguese studies and, consequently, that of international business outside the USA.

 

Keywords: Institutional distance; FDI decisions; Portugal; multinational enterprises; panel data

 

 

[PT]

Título: "Decisões sobre o IDE e a distância institucional e empresas multinacionais em Portugal"

Abstract

Objetivo: O objetivo deste artigo é examinar os efeitos da distância institucional nas decisões estratégicas de IDE das empresas multinacionais estrangeiras em Portugal. Após uma construção de distância desagregada, este artigo também investiga os efeitos diferenciados de cada dimensão da distância.

Desenho/metodologia/abordagem: Para testar a hipótese proposta, uma análise de dados em painel é usada com efeitos aleatórios e as regressões são estimadas pelo método dos Mínimos Quadrados Generalizados (GLS).

Resultados: Os resultados confirmam a existência de uma relação significativa entre a distância institucional e as decisões de IDE em Portugal, enquanto os efeitos diferenciados de cada dimensão também foram confirmados, com sete das nove dimensões da distância institucional influenciando significativamente essas decisões estratégicas. Entre eles, verificou-se que a distância administrativa impede constantemente as decisões de investimento estrangeiro em Portugal, provavelmente devido a questões legais.

Originalidade: pesquisas anteriores em negócios internacionais apontaram efeitos prejudiciais da distância nas decisões de IDE. Ao examinar essas decisões com um construto desagregado, este estudo demonstra que diferentes dimensões da distância podem afetar as decisões de IDE de maneira diferente. Como a grande maioria dos estudos de negócios internacionais se concentra nas empresas americanas, este artigo contribui com um ponto de vista diferente, expandindo a pesquisa empírica dos estudos portugueses e, consequentemente, a de negócios internacionais fora dos EUA.

 

Palavras-chave: Distância institucional; Decisões de IDE; Portugal; empresas multinacionais; dados do painel


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aleksynska, M., & Havrylchyk, O. (2013). FDI from the south: The role of institutional distance and natural resources. European Journal of Political Economy, 29, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2012.09.001

Ambos, B., & Håkanson, L. (2014). The concept of distance in international management research. Journal of International Management, 20(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2013.10.003

Anand, J., & Kogut, B. (1997). Technological capabilities of countries, firm rivalry and foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(3), 445–465. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490107

Anderson, E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review, 69(1), 106–116.

Arslan, A., & Larimo, J. (2010). Ownership strategy of multinational enterprises and the impacts of regulative and normative institutional distance: Evidence from Finnish foreign direct investments in central and eastern Europe. Journal of East-West Business, 16(3), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669868.2010.523370

Arslan, A., & Larimo, J. (2011). Greenfield investments or acquisitions: Impacts of institutional distance on establishment mode choice of multinational enterprises in emerging economies. Journal of Global Marketing, 24(4), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2011.602323

Bae, J.-H., & Salomon, R. (2010). Institutional distance in international business research. In T. M. Devinney, T. Pedersen, & L. Tihanyi (Eds.), Advances in International Management: The Past, Present and Future of International Business & Management (Vol. 23, pp. 327–349). New York: Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1571-5027(2010)00000230020

Bailey, N., & Li, S. (2015). Cross-national distance and FDI: The moderating role of host country local demand. Journal of International Management, 21(4), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2014.11.002

Balestra, P. (1996). Introduction to linear models for panel data. In L. Mátyás & P. Sevestre (Eds.), The Econometrics of Panel Data: A Handbook of the Theory with Applications (2nd ed., pp. 25–33). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Baltagi, B. H. (2015). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (5th ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Barros, C. P., Damásio, B., & Faria, J. R. (2014). Reverse FDI in Europe: An Analysis of Angola’s FDI in Portugal. African Development Review, 26(1), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12072

Bénassy-Quéré, A., Coupet, M., & Mayer, T. (2007). Institutional determinants of foreign direct investment. The World Economy, 30(5), 764–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01022.x

Berry, H. (2006). Leaders, laggards, and the pursuit of foreign knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.509

Berry, H., Guillén, M. F., & Zhou, N. (2010). An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1460–1480. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.28

Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Buckley, P. J., Clegg, J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. (2007). The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400277

Capron, L., & Guillén, M. F. (2009). National corporate governance institutions and post-acquisition target reorganization. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 803–833. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.768

Chao, M. C.-H., & Kumar, V. (2010). The impact of institutional distance on the international diversity–performance relationship. Journal of World Business, 45(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.04.005

Chiao, Y., Lo, F., & Yu, C. (2010). Choosing between wholly‐owned subsidiaries and joint ventures of MNCs from an emerging market. International Marketing Review, 27(3), 338–365. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331011047998

Choi, J. J., Lee, S. M., & Shoham, A. (2016). The effects of institutional distance on FDI inflow: General environmental institutions (GEI) versus minority investor protection institutions (MIP). International Business Review, 25(1), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.11.010

Conti, C. R., Parente, R., & de Vasconcelos, F. C. (2016). When distance does not matter: Implications for Latin American multinationals. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 1980–1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.144

Contractor, F. J., Lahiri, S., Elango, B., & Kundu, S. K. (2014). Institutional, cultural and industry related determinants of ownership choices in emerging market FDI acquisitions. International Business Review, 23(5), 931–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.02.005

De Beule, F., Elia, S., & Piscitello, L. (2014). Entry and access to competencies abroad: Emerging market firms versus advanced market firms. Journal of International Management, 20(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2013.05.002

Delios, A., & Henisz, W. J. (2000). Japanese firms’ investment strategies in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556397

Dow, D., & Karunaratna, A. (2006). Developing a multidimensional instrument to measure psychic distance stimuli. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 578–602. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400221

Dunning, J. H. (1977). Trade, location of economic activity and the MNE: A search for an eclectic approach. In P.-O. Hesselborn, B. Ohlin, & P. M. Wijkman (Eds.), The International Allocation of Economic Activity (pp. 395–418). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Dunning, J. H. (1993). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

Dunning, J. H. (2000). The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 9(2), 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(99)00035-9

Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(4), 573–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-007-9074-z

Eden, L., & Miller, S. R. (2004). Distance matters: Liability of foreigness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. In M. A. Hitt & J. L. C. Cheng (Eds.), Theories of the Multinational Enterprise: Diversity, Complexity and Relevance (Advances in International Management) (Vol. 16, pp. 187–221). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Estrin, S., Baghdasaryan, D., & Meyer, K. E. (2009). The impact of institutional and human resource distance on international entry strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 46(7), 1171–1196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00838.x

Faria, M. P. (2017). O impacto da distância da corrupção nas estratégias de posse: Os casos das subsidiárias estrangeiras de multinacionais portuguesas e espanholas. Master thesis in Management. Universidade de Coimbra.

Ferraz, P. A. dos R. (2014). A corrupção e os determinantes do IDE: As relações de IDE entre Portugal e o resto do mundo. Master thesis in International Business. Instituto Politécnico de Leiria. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/1402 (accessed 11 May 2018).

Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4

Gallego, Á., & Casillas, J. C. (2014). Choice of markets for initial export activities: Differences between early and late exporters. International Business Review, 23(5), 1021–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.03.004

García-Canal, E., & Guillén, M. F. (2008). Risk and the strategy of foreign location choice in regulated industries. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1097–1115. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.692

Gastanaga, V. M., Nugent, J. B., & Pashamova, B. (1998). Host country reforms and FDI inflows: How much difference do they make? World Development, 26(7), 1299–1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00049-7

Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance still matters. The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137–147.

Gooris, J., & Peeters, C. (2014). Home–host country distance in offshore governance choices. Journal of International Management, 20(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2013.02.002

Guimarães, P., Figueiredo, O., & Woodward, D. (2000). Agglomeration and the location of foreign direct investment in Portugal. Journal of Urban Economics, 47(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1999.2138

Guler, I., & Guillén, M. F. (2010). Institutions and the internationalization of US venture capital firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.35

Henisz, W. J. (2000). The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics, 12(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0343.00066

Henisz, W. J., & Delios, A. (2001). Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990-1996. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 443–475. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094871

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences inwork-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Hsiao, C. (2004). Analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hutzschenreuter, T., Kleindienst, I., & Lange, S. (2016). The concept of distance in international business research: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12065

Hymer, S. H. (1960). The international operations of national firms, a study of direct foreign investment. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657288

Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C. W., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., … Puranen, B. (Eds.). (2014). World values survey: All rounds. Madrid: JD Systems Institute.

Ionascu, D., Meyer, K. E., & Estrin, S. (2005). Institutional Distance and International Business Strategies in Emerging Economies. SSRN Electronic Journal, (728), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.665110

Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. (2008). Comparing capitalisms: Understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 540–561. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400375

Jiménez, A., & de la Fuente, D. (2016). Learning from others: The impact of vicarious experience on the psychic distance and FDI relationship. Management International Review, 56(5), 633–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-015-0269-0

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (1977). Process of the the internationalization development firm - A model of knowledge foreign and increasing market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1057

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.24

Kang, J., Lee, J. Y., & Ghauri, P. N. (2017). The interplay of mahalanobis distance and firm capabilities on MNC subsidiary exits from host countries. Management International Review, 57(3), 379–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-016-0287-6

Kester, W. C. (1996). American and japanese corporate governance: Convergence to best practice? In S. Berger & R. Dore (Eds.), National Diversity and Global Capitalism (pp. 107–137). Ithaca, United States: Cornell University Press.

Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490394

Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: a contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308–324. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893938

Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.1580441

La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155. https://doi.org/10.1086/250042

Lane, P. R., & Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. (2018). The external wealth of nations revisited: International financial ntegration in the aftermath of the global financial crisis. IMF Economic Review, 66(1), 189–222. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-017-0048-y

Lavie, D., & Miller, S. R. (2008). Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organization Science, 19(4), 623–646. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0341

Lee, Y., Hemmert, M., & Kim, J. (2014). What drives the international ownership strategies of Chinese firms? The role of distance and home-country institutional factors in outward acquisitions. Asian Business & Management, 13(3), 197–225. https://doi.org/10.1057/abm.2014.5

Leitão, N. C. (2011). Foreign direct investment: Localization and institutional determinants. Management Research and Practice, 3(2), 1–6.

Leitão, N. C., & Faustino, H. C. (2008). Portuguese foreign direct investments inflows: An empirical investigation. Working paper No. 54/2008. ISEG Working Paper. Universidade Técnica de Lisboa. Lisboa.

Leitão, N. C., & Faustino, H. C. (2010). Determinants of foreign direct investment in Portugal. Jounal of Applied Business and Economics, 11(3), 19–26.

Madsen, P. M. (2009). Does corporate investment drive a “race to the bottom” in environmental protection? A reexamination of the effect of environmental regulation on investment. Academy of Management Journal, 52(6), 1297–1318. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.47085173

Magnusson, P., Wilson, R. T., Zdravkovic, S., Xin Zhou, J., & Westjohn, S. A. (2008). Breaking through the cultural clutter: A comparative assessment of multiple cultural and institutional frameworks. International Marketing Review, 25(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330810866272

Mimmack, G. M., Mason, S. J., & Galpin, J. S. (2001). Choice of distance matrices in cluster analysis: Defining regions. Journal of Climate, 14(12), 2790–2797. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<2790:CODMIC>2.0.CO;2

Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis (pp. 3–21). New York: Oxford University Press.

North, D. C. (1994). Economic performance through time. American Economic Review, 84(3), 359–368.

O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6

OECD. (2008). OECD benchmark definition of foreign direct investment: Fourth edition (4th ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing.

Oxley, J. E., & Yeung, B. (2001). E-commerce readiness: Institutional environment and international competitiveness. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(4), 705–723. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490991

Padmanabhan, P., & Cho, K. R. (1996). Ownership strategy for a foreign affiliate: An empirical investigation of japanese firms. Management International Review, 36(1), 45–65.

Pajunen, K. (2008). Institutions and inflows of foreign direct investment: A fuzzy-set analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 652–669. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400371

Pattnaik, C., & Lee, J. Y. (2014). Distance and divestment of Korean MNC affiliates: The moderating role of entry mode and experience. Asia Pacific Business Review, 20(1), 174–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2013.815454

Peng, M. W. (2002). Towards an institution-based view of business strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2/3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016291702714

Peng, M. W. (2006). Global Strategy. Cincinnati: South-Western Thompson.

Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920–936. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400377

Perkins, S. E. (2014). When does prior experience pay? Institutional experience and the multinational corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(1), 145–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839214523603

Podda, P. A. (2016). The impact of institutional distance on FDI inflows in the Czech Republic. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, 24(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aop.495

Pogrebnyakov, N., & Maitland, C. F. (2011). Institutional distance and the internationalization process: The case of mobile operators. Journal of International Management, 17(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2010.12.003

Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.

Reis, N. M. R. (2017). The impact of institutional distance on cross-border mergers and acquisitions completion. Doctoral thesis in Business Administration. Universidade de Coimbra.

Reis, N. M. R., Ferreira, M. P., & Santos, J. C. (2013). Institutional distance and cross-border mergers and acquisitions completion: A conceptual framework. In 9th Iberian International Business Conference. Braga (Portugal).

Rueda-Sabater, E. (2000). Corporate governance: And the bargaining power of developing countries to attract foreign investment. Corporate Governance, 8(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00189

Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests and identities (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Shenkar, O. (2001). Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490982

Simões, S. M. Q. O. (2016). O investimento direto estrangeiro de Portugal no resto do mundo: Influência da distância psíquica. Master thesis in International Business. Instituto Politécnico de Leiria. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/2301 (accessed 30 April 2018).

Stöttinger, B., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (1998). Explaining export development through psychic distance: Enlightening or elusive? International Marketing Review, 15(5), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339810236353

Tavares, J. (2004). Institutions and economic growth in Portugal: A quantitative exploration. Portuguese Economic Journal, 3(1), 49–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-004-0029-8

UNCTAD. (2017a). 2017 Handbook of Statistics. Geneva.

UNCTAD. (2017b). World investment report 2017: Investment and the digital economy. Geneva.

Vachani, S. (2005). Problems of foreign subsidiaries of SMEs compared with large companies. International Business Review, 14(4), 415–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.03.002

Werner, S. (2002). Recent developments in international management research: A review of 20 top management journals. Journal of Management, 28(3), 277–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800303

Whitley, R. (1992). Business systems in East Asia: Firms, markets and societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Xu, D., Pan, Y., & Beamish, P. W. (2004). The effect of regulative and normative distances on MNE ownership and expatriate strategies. Management International Review, 44(3), 285–307.

Xu, D., & Shenkar, O. (2002). Note: Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 608–618. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2002.7566108

Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.2307/256683

Zaheer, S., Schomaker, M. S., & Nachum, L. (2012). Distance without direction: Restoring credibility to a much-loved construct. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.43

Zhang, M. M. (2015). Cross-national distance and insidership within networks: Japanese MNCs’ ownership strategies in their overseas subsidiaries. Asia Pacific Business Review, 21(3), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2015.1020649




Copyright (c)

ISSN: 2183-5594 

Indexing: GOOGLE SCHOLAR - LATINDEX - DRJI - ICI JOURNALS MASTER - REDIB